The research literature shows that Chiropractic is only beneficial for temporary lower back pain relief. That's it. Chiropractors make many bogus claims that they can't support scientifically which is why they are generally regarded as quacks. Chiropractic is also risky. Massage provides only temporary relief too, but probably has more overall benefit than chiropractic as it works the muscles and is relaxing (depending on the type of massage). If you want to address the problem, you should consider physiotherapy or a musculoskeletal doctor.
-------
EDIT: @Mr E, you are lying as usual. I am not providing disinformation, and to support what I have said:
Ernst E (2008). "Chiropractic: a critical evaluation". J Pain Symptom Manage 35 (5): 544รขโฌโ62.
"With the possible exception of back pain, chiropractic spinal manipulation has not been shown to be effective for any medical condition.... The concepts of chiropractic are not based on solid science and its therapeutic value has not been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18280103
And you have not once in my memory explained chiropractic. All you do is claim it will cure whatever the asker is asking about. I hope this display of dishonesty will influence the asker away from chiropractic.
Please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Singh#Chiropractic_lawsuit_and_backlash
http://www.chirobase.org/