Saw on CNN over the weekend that approximately 15% of Americans have tattoos. So, how come masseuses/escorts/streetwalkers far exceed this national average, coming to over 75% in many cases? If their representation was about equal to the population as a whole, it would not upset me as much as how they seem to think that it is almost like a national badge of honour, a membership card in the sorority of call girls, and how they arbitrarily think that we, as clients, should simply "take it" and still patronize them. I refuse to take a nude anything without asking upfront "am I going to see tattoos if you disrobe?" and if I am told yes, then my set of Prime Ministerial portraits stays within my wallet, although I might be inclined to hand over the new Stephen Harper $70 bill for their collection. The other groups where tattoos predominate include gang members, drug users and prison inmates...so why would the average MP/SP want to be associated with these unsavoury types?
I make it a point to tell a manager or receptionist or owner as to why I am sending back a girl...speaking up is my constitutional right and if more people did, we might actually see a higher quality girl (tonight, at the Oriental Clinic on St-Regis in Dollard, the girl told me she had been an industrial account in Beijing, and she gave an excellent hard pressure massage coupled with tickle torture).
I make it a point to tell a manager or receptionist or owner as to why I am sending back a girl...speaking up is my constitutional right and if more people did, we might actually see a higher quality girl (tonight, at the Oriental Clinic on St-Regis in Dollard, the girl told me she had been an industrial account in Beijing, and she gave an excellent hard pressure massage coupled with tickle torture).