Photogenic Quality and Beauty: What is the Number One Website?

[Pompal 09.]

Comparing the hundreds X rated and non-X rated websites I have visited, I am hard pressed to name a better one than that of Hands from Heaven Spa in terms of its unusually rich, photogenic quality and the sheer beauty of the girls. Can anyone name a better website strictly on the basis of the foregoing? ---Dr. Moe

 

[Glutburger]

yes.... there are a few sites dedicated to just pictures of beautiful ladies. I do not have the urls on this machine, but when I get back to my office on Monday I will post them.

BTW, does anyone recognize the lass here? www.dcww.ca

 

[E-rock]

She looks real familiar... care to give us a hint

 

[Will in TN]

I wish I knew....thats why I'm asking. She looks familiar but I cant place who she is. Already asked the guy who owns the site and he said he got her image from a disk filled with exotic pictures.

 

[I Love Funnyjunk.com]

IT and HFH have the best quality photo's.

 

[Lady Burps Alot]

Rusty, I already said that HFH may well be #1. I see nothing special about the IT website in terms of photogenic quality. ---Dr. Moe

 

[SJM]

The photos for Silhouette Spa are quite well done. You can see them at:

http://www.silhouettespa.com

 

[NM-47]

What exactly is so different between the pics on the HFH site compared to the pics on the IT site? They look to be of the same quality. The only difference is IT has better girls.

 

[try to no avail]

I'll agree with fuzi....silhouette spa photos...top notch pics...they have more pics with the ladies showing their faces as well...

hfh = better girls...

 

[lina]

Hey Rusty!

The HFH pictures have a richer and more brilliant phonogenic quality about them than do the IT pictures. To me, they appear more lifelike. Check them both out one after the other and see if you agree. I do agree with you that the HFH girls are better looking overall as judged by the photos. ---Dr. Moe

 

[rockin JC]

Paul, as I said in my PM to you, the two websites have totally different looks in terms of the richness and lifelike nature of the photos. I am from St. Louis and have been to neither place. You could not ask for a more unbiased opinion. Be it by accident or design, the HFH website has better photogenic quality. ----Dr. Moe

 

[Nitram]

I believe it is because of the background color somewhat. Normally I would say it is because I am rushed when taking the pics of IT.. but the pics that I took of Alexis on the bike weren't rushed.. If you take the same pic.. and put it on a white background.. I believe it would appear differently... what do you think Dr.Moe?

 

[kouneli]

Kayla

 

[Mr.noitall]

Kayla, I agree with you about the white background giving many of the HFH pictures that intangible "look" that is a cut above. However, that is just one factor. Compared to IT, the overall appearance of the HFH website (not just the photos) is more attractive, and the page from which you click and pick the girls has dramatically superior quality. Also, there are many more pictures of each girl at the HFH site, and yes, Paul, the girls at HFH are (overall) better looking. ----Dr. Moe

 

[Marc]

Paul,

I get the feeling that you are being a bit sarcastic. DO NOT take my quotes out of context (and leave parts off) to fulfill your agenda. You seem to have a need to convince people that you are unbiased. Never did I say or imply that you are biased. The way you took the final "quote" of mine out of context is interesting. You know full well what I was referring to (based upon the first PM you sent me). ---Dr. Moe

 

[Senthil k]

KBear, I did not say that HFH has, unequivocally, the "best-taken pictures on the net". I said that in terms of both the photogenic quality of the pictures and the beauty of the girls that I would be hard pressed to name a better website. I am inviting others to agree, disagree, and name their own candidates for the number one spot. ---Dr. Moe

 

[blue03neon]

Paul, if such is the case, then please accept my apology. The two PMs you sent me, in conjunction with your last post, led me to what appears to be an incorrect conclusion. I'll accept your word on the matter. I hope to visit one or both of your spas in April. ---Dr. Moe

 

[Guido McInsideYou]

The pictures on the HFH website are excellent, considering the limitations that were in place, ie. equipment, lighting, location, models, etc.

However, to answer your question,

 

[koala4poly]

KBear, your Maxim site is good! As to your comment about Kayla.......with me there is no strok'en.......just the truth well spoken! ---Dr. Moe

 

[Me no know]

.. not the skills.. the camera KBear.. it's a far cry from what I used in the beginning.. the camera I have now is truly amazing. As far as real photography.. I have thought of taking a course .. just no time.. So.. I look at the girls.. and think in my mind.. 'if I was a man.. how would I want her to pose for me?'.. and .. 'what turns me on & looks sexy?'.. I get lost quite a bit.. as you said, there is only so much you can do in limited space and time.. same old positions.. same old clothes.. same shit.. makes me sad cause the ideas in my mind of what I would really like to do is a far cry from what is actually produced (an example of what I like is the pics of Alexis on the bike). I imagine if I took a few classes it would help a bit too. But hey.. lol...the amateur shots are good enough for the guys to be the one's who are gettin the stroken Kbear.. not me *S*