Announcement To Spa promoters - owners - Important notice

[cali99]

You seriuos about this?

 

[JimiNY]

admin Looks like you are exercising your right for favouritism on here.

 

[admin]

admin Looks like you are exercising your right for favouritism on here.

You have the right to have an option. I don't have to agree with set option, but appreciate you sharing it.

 

[JimiNY]

You have the right to have an option. I don't have to agree with set option, but appreciate you sharing it.

There is only one thing you appreciate.

 

[admin]

Do I have to post all the double daily posting on here, regardless of whether
it is on the same thread on the same day or on another thread?
Apparently you warned the owner but not me.
She did not understand what you were saying, needs a translator, I can see
you taking advantage of that. Is that how you operate?

In case you did not know that, you are one of MANY promoters for that spa, if you did not get a notice personally, doesn't mean other promoters did not receive same warning several days ago.

Assumption is ....

 

[OG_funguy]

@admin, I've seen some shady things but for a spa to take another spa's pics and claim those girls work there...that's a new low. Can anything be done about this?

 

[xtc27]

@admin, I've seen some shady things but for a spa to take another spa's pics and claim those girls work there...that's a new low. Can anything be done about this?


View attachment 383572

I think if u want action … provide clear evidence. I checked those pix & don’t notice watermark f/ another spa… mebbe Imissed it?

So u should, IMHO, post pics f/ other spa so it’s obv… put the dates post link w it.

I once posted a pic & guys got mad, said I stole it… meanwhile, mpa gave me the pic f/ her own phone! She owns her own pics, not the spa… but if spa owned the pics, that’d b different.

And… if they’re already out there on internet, then… …

 

[OG_funguy]

I think if u want action … provide clear evidence. I checked those pix & don’t notice watermark f/ another spa… mebbe Imissed it?

So u should, IMHO, post pics f/ other spa so it’s obv… put the dates post link w it.

I once posted a pic & guys got mad, said I stole it… meanwhile, mpa gave me the pic f/ her own phone! She owns her own pics, not the spa… but if spa owned the pics, that’d b different.

And… if they’re already out there on internet, then… …

I can provide clear evidence to @admin if he needs that...

Btw, those pics are from spas like BMR, Acewell and this girl does NOT work at the spa that posted those pics

PS: I agree with you that it's fine if the girl provided her "own" pics...btw, if a girl has pics taken for her while employed at a spa, those really aren't 'her' pics but that's a discussion for another time

 

[admin]

I can provide clear evidence to @admin if he needs that...

Btw, those pics are from spas like BMR, Acewell and this girl does NOT work at the spa that posted those pics

PS: I agree with you that it's fine if the girl provided her "own" pics...btw, if a girl has pics taken for her while employed at a spa, those really aren't 'her' pics but that's a discussion for another time

If you don't feel comfortable engaging the poster directly, send me something I can use during the conversation with the poster.

I also like @xtc27 idea about watermarking....specifically if you are worried about IP.

 

[OG_funguy]

If you don't feel comfortable engaging the poster directly, send me something I can use during the conversation with the poster.

I also like @xtc27 idea about watermarking....specifically if you are worried about IP.

Thanks,

Most new pics are watermarked now (ever since some promoters started stealing pics from other spas) but the early ones weren't and they can easily download those ones...

 

[xtc27]

I can provide clear evidence to @admin if he needs that...

Btw, those pics are from spas like BMR, Acewell and this girl does NOT work at the spa that posted those pics

PS: I agree with you that it's fine if the girl provided her "own" pics...btw, if a girl has pics taken for her while employed at a spa, those really aren't 'her' pics but that's a discussion for another time

Oh yeah, if the spa took the pix, it’s theirs… altho ethically they shouldn’t use if&when she leaves

In this case, seems clear that girl don’t work w Mia… it’s very possible it’s not “Mia & Friends” but a freelance shill who stole the pics…

I caught a spa (or shill) using Catherine Tog’s pics… she picked up the phone & threatened them! Pics got removed fast!

… I still have that reply f/ her… she gave them 3 days! Or else!

 

[OG_funguy]

Oh yeah, if the spa took the pix, it’s theirs… altho ethically they shouldn’t use if&when she leaves

In this case, seems clear that girl don’t work w Mia… it’s very possible it’s not “Mia & Friends” but a freelance shill who stole the pics…

I caught a spa (or shill) using Catherine Tog’s pics… she picked up the phone & threatened them! Pics got removed fast!

… I still have that reply f/ her… she gave them 3 days! Or else!

True...that's possible.

 

[JimiNY]

@admin, I've seen some shady things but for a spa to take another spa's pics and claim those girls work there...that's a new low. Can anything be done about this?


View attachment 383572

Renee and I had to start putting the phone number across quite a while back.
Is that considered watermarking?
Missed that one of Rebecca that went to Mei's spa

 

[xtc27]

Renee and I had to start putting the phone number across quite a while back.
Is that considered watermarking?
Missed that one of Rebecca that went to Mei's spa

Watermarking = a bit more subtle … 2me, bold text w name & phone # = branding… it works, but thieves can readily spot it & edit it out… watermarking, they may miss & actually may repost without removing… then theyre cot dead 2 rights

 

[bob_loblaw]

Watermarking = a bit more subtle … 2me, bold text w name & phone # = branding… it works, but thieves can readily spot it & edit it out… watermarking, they may miss & actually may repost without removing… then theyre cot dead 2 rights

Right but phone # is way easier includes info and it's not that hard to place it where it's hard to remove but doesn't take away from the photo

Of course you can always make it partially transparent and get the best of both

 

[xtc27]

Right but phone # is way easier includes info and it's not that hard to place it where it's hard to remove but doesn't take away from the photo

Of course you can always make it partially transparent and get the best of both

Well, yeah… brand w phone #, watermark (semitransparent) w spa name. … in several spots, even right on the girl’s clothes…

 

[xtc27]

This one looks like another example of blatant copying of other spas' photos that they took time to create:

Spa AD - 🌟⚡️🌟SPARKLING SPA🌟⚡️🌟NEW MANAGEMENT❤️IN MARKHAM❤️50 LOCKRIDGE AVENUE UNIT #8🔥SUPERSTAR SERVICE QUEEN ZOE & FRIENDS🔥AVAILABLE EVERYDAY☎️437-446-6688☎️

Which photos are real?

massageplanet.net

Could b true, but I took a glance… that’s not enuf, y’a gotta give proof.

Don’t xxpect admin’s gonna research it… if it’s stolen, show the original… ideally contact the poster & demand their removal… cc admin. Just showing pics, that’s not gonna work

 

[Spawarrior99]

Could b true, but I took a glance… that’s not enuf, y’a gotta give proof.

Don’t xxpect admin’s gonna research it… if it’s stolen, show the original… ideally contact the poster & demand their removal… cc admin. Just showing pics, that’s not gonna work

Really? Your pathetic fat brown indian ass is still posting on massage planet?
With admins grace? when admin gave me a crown and I told admin you needed a crown too!
god help me.

 

[xtc27]

Really? Your pathetic fat brown indian ass is still posting on massage planet?
god help me.

 

[Distortion]

@admin

Promoters are advertising west end spas in the Toronto board.
Oakville, Burlington, Cambridge and KW all end up in Toronto when they have their own specific location boards. At the very least can the promoters copy and past their west end spa ads in the regional board also? Thanks.

Edit-typos