Deflecting again I see. The issue is not Pfizer, it is any โreputableโ expert would be objective and stick to their area of expertise. They would not pander to their audience and talk in areas they have no expertise in. Absolutely no scientist or medical expert would ever use the word โ
Overlordโ. Picture this, you are on a jury in a medical malpractice case, heโs the expert witness describing how something works and you are trying to very unbiased and open minded. You are listening tho Hume and actual understanding iwhat heโs saying and in your mind you are thinking โok, Iโm getting this, itโs making senseโ, then when heโs midway into his Q&A he says this is all driven by the โ
Overloardsโ. What would any reasonable unbiased person think? Theyโll think heโs a nut job and not only did he throw his credibility out the window with that one word he also damaged the case that lawyer was trying to make.
Hereโs one more little tidbit to wrap your little brain around. He tried to claim he had no reason to lie. He went on saying he was 62 years old, married with children and grandchildren happy on his farm that heโs still paying off.
Wait a minute! Why is a doctor that was very highly paid over his career still paying off a farm at 62? Most regular people, let alone highly paid ones, would manage their money and have their properties paid off in the 50s and maybe even their 40s. His webpage says heโs been with his wife (a PhD) since high school, so heโs not had to pay out any large divorce settlement. As per Wikipedia, he is not currently employed. Yes, Wikipedia since LinkedIn deleted his profile. Wait, what! LinkedIn cancelled him! But, if you go to his webpage he himself shows how heโs getting paid and earning money to pay off the farm that still has a mortgage on. He wasnโt some objective expert on the Rogan podcast, he was getting paid to be there. Being on podcasts is one of his sources of income. So yes, he wasnโt being objective, he was pandering and feeding raw meat to an audience already programmed to believe one narrative only.
View attachment 191243