Spoke with MPA in question.
No time to post. Here's Coles notes version.
Established: No pinching. No assault. No pushy demands.
Otherwise, client would've been barred from D or other MPs for that matter (desc cir over the whacker network).
Management very concern whether:
Assault? - girls safety always come 1st.
MPA cheated client? - dismissal and refund/credit client.
Difference in expectation? Backlash? - the faceless massageplanet.net complain board.
===========================
Been suggested several times, for client to see Management, in the case of bad/poor session received, or ask for a different girl during session, but no compliants been voiced.
For those curious, MPA in questions been relatively busy, some are repeats.
===========================
Perhaps out of respect for MPA in questions, we should continue the morality discussions in seperate thread. Some food for thoughts.
MPA do not have to offer the full menu to everyone. Menu means there's a choice in offering and selecting. And the term YMMV.
The kid's view been tainted by experiencing better MPAs early on, in his case, K girls. As vets know, when the standard is high, hard for others to compare, especially new MPAs.
The question of how much he makes, she makes is irrelevant. Bad service is bad service! With massageplanet.net, deceptive MPAs will be weed out.
Good to see many caring clients. On behalf of the girls, big hugs & kisses (P.S.: YMMV and not from GT)