I thnk members who have posted no reviews over an extended period of time should be banned. After all, this is a review board.
Quaqgitty for example has 117 posts since joining in Dec/07 and has posted only one review (his first post) which was an useless shill. All his other posts are comments or criticisms on other members' reviews. This is not contribution and paying back to the board.
I would say people who have not made contributions and paid back to the community with reviews of SPs or MPAs should not be allowed to have free lunches any more.
CP
Quaqgitty for example has 117 posts since joining in Dec/07 and has posted only one review (his first post) which was an useless shill. All his other posts are comments or criticisms on other members' reviews. This is not contribution and paying back to the board.
I would say people who have not made contributions and paid back to the community with reviews of SPs or MPAs should not be allowed to have free lunches any more.
CP