Question Alright. Which one of you guys is this? (Secret Filming)

[Essem]

Disturbing, but nothing new..

Video screens shots of mpas in the room have been posted on massageplanet for years! Why are the mpas acting so surprised by this? Should have been checking for phones and other devices for years now!

This is the first guy to get exposed, usually its the women, so kudos to Savana! Shes a sweet girl this fools lucky it wasn't someone else!

 

[UsefulIdiot]

Okay, here is another scenario - the session finishes, the guy takes a shower while Savana cleans up, she notices the phone, takes a closer look, sees that it is recording, stops the recording then air drops the video to her phone, then screams at the guy, gets him to delete the video from his phone, demands some kind of compensation which he does not hand over, and then she tweets the start of of the video as revenge.

If the video gets more attention will there be new hobbyists as a result, guys who were never aware of this biz, or never imagined someone like themselves partaking? Maybe a brown wave?!

 

[Unknkowngenius]

Okay, here is another scenario - the session finishes, the guy takes a shower while Savana cleans up, she notices the phone, takes a closer look, sees that it is recording, stops the recording then air drops the video to her phone, then screams at the guy, gets him to delete the video from his phone, demands some kind of compensation which he does not hand over, and then she tweets the start of of the video as revenge.

If the video gets more attention will there be new hobbyists as a result, guys who were never aware of this biz, or never imagined someone like themselves partaking? Maybe a brown wave?!

Bruhhhh could you imagine?.... wait ....your scenario is all hypothetical tho right?.....cause she caught him right at the start of the session before she took off any clothes......she never brings her phone into the room during a session....das why she had to record it off the man's phone outside the room....all yuh fellas real jokey....trying to paint her in a bad light when her privacy was violated....

 

[cupcrazy]

simple. the participants in the porn shoot gave their consents whereas the MPA didn't. Some places have signs stating that by entering the premises, they will be recorded.

Funny enough, filming of pornography is legal but prostitution at a spa isn't.

Anyway, if you want to film sometimes it's just best to just ask, quite a few are open to it (especially with a bigger tips). I find those who use their real pics and didn't bother to blur it out are totally open to it (after all their faces are already public). I have one where the lady didn't even care when I told her I am uploading it to the internet.

 

[Toomanymiles]

sandeep really acting like he ain’t ever gonna get the money again to go back.

 

[cupcrazy]

sandeep really acting like he ain’t ever gonna get the money again to go back.

he probably prefer not getting his money back then getting arrested. The guy may get off since nothing was recorded really unless the police found secret recording on his cell phone. he may deleted the previous videos on his cell phone. The tech people have a way to retrieve the recorded videos. Either way he better get a good lawyer.

 

[drunkenmaster]

I am confused here.
If he filmed it.
Did he post it somewhere?
How did the ladies get his cellphone?
Does the room have their ceiling camera?
Wasn't it dark in the room when you turn off the light?
Why did he leave his phone on the desk?
Where exactly did he park his phone?
Can the owners buy a switch that shuts all cell phone on that floor?
Can't they put the bed away from an angle, so you can't film?

There was either as camera in the room watching him or she was suspicious of him and was recording him with her phone through the peephole.

 

[Stingraye]

As bad as this whole ordeal is, he violated her privacy right. But would she really want to get the cops involved?

First of all they probably won't give a shit and not only that, she'll heat up herself in the process. Having to go to court with her business and real name out there. A judge and Crown aren't going to care about a Mpa who probably ain't paying taxes anyway.

Also, like someone else mentioned, the politicians will see this and say they're not social distancing, no mask, etc. Close all the parlours down. Then she'll kill her means of making a living. Cerb is no longer around.

 

[AthleticAF]

There was either as camera in the room watching him or she was suspicious of him and was recording him with her phone through the peephole.

I'm gonna go ahead and guess there are cameras in the rooms. They have them in the waiting rooms, so only makes sense.
I'm sure it's to "protect the girls" BUT, still.

 

[BigPapi]

Let me spit knowledge while you lost souls continue to bring in the flowers and mourn for poor old innocent Savana.

Its illegal to record someone without there consent or knowledge. Cool.. man commits crime no argument there. The Hoe however check this.. takes his phone and now records him (now without his consent or knowledge), committing the same crime shes been crying about.

If Hoe didn't prove how stupid she was already, Hoe proceeds to post the video online (which is in itself a second crime committed) with the caption "im pressing charges" to remind you yet again how stupid she is. Aint no one pressing charges and ain't no cop charging Mr. Opilumpa. He don fucked up but we all know cops don't show up to a "hi I work at a spa and a man is recording me" call.

Savana baby girl.. this is a get your bouncer or pimp beat his ass call or let him go scenerio. Don't use fake scare tactics you not smart enough for that

 

[AthleticAF]

Let me spit knowledge while you lost souls continue to bring in the flowers and mourn for poor old innocent Savana.

Its illegal to record someone without there consent or knowledge.

Is it legal to record a private conversation? Wiretapping and the one party consent exception to the rule against interception | LegalTree.ca

legaltree.ca

BigPapi, wrong dude. You never heard of the "one party consent" law. *spits knowledge*

So if any of you are calling your insurance companies etc, record your conversations, just like they do with us for "training and customer service purposes". JUST DON'T TELL THEM YOU ARE. It saved me twice with a bank, for not putting a memo on my profile, meanwhile the rep/agent said she was doing so.
And another when my car insurance company, also shockingly forgot to put a memo on my profile that would lower my rate which I was told would happen after a 3 year term.

They want to record us, I record them. Obviously don't tell them.

Is it legal to secretly record phone calls like Jody Wilson-Raybould did? What you need to know - National | Globalnews.ca

Section 184 of the Criminal Code states that recording private conversations is legal as long as one of the parties involved in the call consents to the recording.

globalnews.ca

For video, I think that's entirely different and especially in those circumstances and won't even begin to assume how this will go down.
It could be drawn out because of her dumbass to post it online, like you said.
But I gotta say, girls in this industry, very few are intelligent.

 

[BigPapi]

Is it legal to record a private conversation? Wiretapping and the one party consent exception to the rule against interception | LegalTree.ca

legaltree.ca

BigPapi, wrong dude. You never heard of the "one party consent" law. *spits knowledge*

So if any of you are calling your insurance companies etc, record your conversations, just like they do with us for "training and customer service purposes". JUST DON'T TELL THEM YOU ARE. It saved me twice with a bank, for not putting a memo on my profile, meanwhile the rep/agent said she was doing so.
And another when my car insurance company, also shockingly forgot to put a memo on my profile that would lower my rate which I was told would happen after a 3 year term.

They want to record us, I record them. Obviously don't tell them.

Is it legal to secretly record phone calls like Jody Wilson-Raybould did? What you need to know - National | Globalnews.ca

Section 184 of the Criminal Code states that recording private conversations is legal as long as one of the parties involved in the call consents to the recording.

globalnews.ca

For video, I think that's entirely different and especially in those circumstances.

Calm your horses cowboy.

Id love to see that play out.. cops start charging the men.. meanwhile the evidence videos all include women upselling sex and blowjobs mad crimes and illegal activity all around bruh

 

[AthleticAF]

Calm your horses cowboy.

Id love to see that play out.. cops start charging the men.. meanwhile the evidence videos all include women upselling sex and blowjobs mad crimes and illegal activity all around bruh

I'm calm, I'm just correcting your spat knowledge.
Your blanket statement of recording and it being illegal was incorrect.

But that would be funny shit for sure, everyone holdin' up their cell phones and pointing at each other
But she is an idiot for posting HER clip online. Like I said, they're not very bright.

 

[Unknkowngenius]

I'm calm, I'm just correcting your spat knowledge.
Your blanket statement of recording and it being illegal was incorrect.

But that would be funny shit for sure, everyone holdin' up their cell phones and pointing at each other
But she is an idiot for posting HER clip online. Like I said, they're not very bright.

Bruh...this ain't no telephone recording...wtf you on about? Lol....it's a crime plain and simple. Kinda sounds like you trying to justify your own recordings in case you get caught one day.

Voyeurism

• 162 (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if
  • (a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or to be engaged in explicit sexual activity;
  • (b) the person is nude, is exposing his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or is engaged in explicit sexual activity, and the observation or recording is done for the purpose of observing or recording a person in such a state or engaged in such an activity; or
  • (c) the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose.

• Punishment
  (5) Every one who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (4)
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
  • (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
• Defence
  (6) No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence serve the public good and do not extend beyond what serves the public good.

Man has no defence here...unless the public good is him going home to Jack it lol

Allyuh man's killing me!

 

[AthleticAF]

Bruh...this ain't no telephone recording...wtf you on about? Lol....it's a crime plain and simple. Kinda sounds like you trying to justify your own recordings in case you get caught one day.

Voyeurism

• 162(1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if
  • (a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or to be engaged in explicit sexual activity;
  • (b) the person is nude, is exposing his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or is engaged in explicit sexual activity, and the observation or recording is done for the purpose of observing or recording a person in such a state or engaged in such an activity; or
  • (c) the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose.

• Punishment
  (5) Every one who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (4)
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
  • (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
• Defence
  (6) No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence serve the public good and do not extend beyond what serves the public good.

Man has no defence here...unless the public good is him going home to Jack it lol

Allyuh man's killing me!

You realize I differentiated between AUDIO and VIDEO recording, or are you a MPA and not intelligent enough to understand the reply and link?

Is it legal to record a private conversation? Wiretapping and the one party consent exception to the rule against interception | LegalTree.ca

legaltree.ca

The one party consent exception to the rule against interception
Statutory provision setting out the one party consent exception
Section 182(2) of the Criminal Code sets out a number of exceptions to the general rule that it is unlawful to intercept private communications. The most important exception for the purposes of this article is the exception that applies when one of the parties to the communication consents to interception i.e. s. 184(2)(a):


184(2) Subsection (1) [i.e. the section prohibiting interception of private communications] does not apply to:
(a) a person who has the consent to intercept, express or implied, of the originator of the private communication or of the person intended by the originator thereof to receive it;
(b) [an interception done under the authorization of a warrant];
(c) [an interception by a telecommunications company providing services to the public who intercepts for the purpose of monitoring the quality of service];
(d) [an interception by a government agent monitoring the airwaves for illegal use of particular radio frequencies]; or
(e) [an interception by persons managing the quality of certain computer services to ensure that those computer services are not used illegally].

Thus any intended recipient of a communication is entitled to record it.

I could be wrong and the video he recorded MAY POSSIBLY be okay, as long as he didn't share it and only kept it to himself.
The problem is, he got caught, she recorded what she saw and then posted it online.
This will be interesting no doubt, because she took HIS PROPERTY and recorded it, then posted the video online.

 

[Unknkowngenius]

You realize I differentiated between AUDIO and VIDEO recording, or are you a MPA and not intelligent enough to understand the reply and link?

Hold up boss man.....you calling me dumb yet you're the one who brining up laws that aren't even applicable to this entire thread. We all taking bout the video in this post and you arguing bout the legality of audio recordings....how that even relevant? So you just decide to post random shit to sound smart? Gtfo bruh

 

[Unknkowngenius]

.

I could be wrong and the video he recorded MAY POSSIBLY be okay, as long as he didn't share it and only kept it to himself.
The problem is, he got caught, she recorded what she saw and then posted it online.
This will be interesting no doubt, because she took HIS PROPERTY and recorded it, then posted the video online.

Doh matter if he kept it to himself or didn't share it...it's still a crime under the Voyeurism law.

And she can definitely argue public good in her defence. Ensuring that other girls don't have to deal with him recording them....what's his excuse for recording her?

Like I said... allyuh men are something else

 

[MrBnH]

Too bad, one should always be open about any filming or pictures and respect everyone's privacy. I don't wish ill on anyone and I hope this sort of thing is rare as I can't see any good quality filming coming out of anything, seems lie a waste of time ? If you want a massage film that is good, try the internet and you can have your pick of girl or scenario if you search all the sites for a video.

 

[Magicmon]

sandeep really acting like he ain’t ever gonna get the money again to go back.

He is shitting his pants right now. If she didn’t already call the cops. He is crying under his bed hoping the cops don’t come knocking. His wife or parents will kill him.

 

[BigPapi]

God damn this is hilarious! Twitter blowing up with dumb blondes reposting this video trying to spread the word and remind us all that recording is an "illegal activity".

Not sure they realize that what they do for a living (upsell portion) is just as "illegal" as far as the law is concerned.

Badabapapa .. im lovinn this!