Question Alright. Which one of you guys is this? (Secret Filming)

[krayjee]

I doubt she goes to the police because then all her real info out there and she might have to testify. Plus any media attention could shut down spas. Politicians will get so much flak why are spas open and gyms not? Whole industry gets shut down. Who will they blame? her She in a lose-lose situation. Plus spas shuts down no income for this girl

Nobody in sound mind will take this to the court and embarrass herself, her family and relatives. It happens all the time at lots of spas. It happened twice at Shangri La a few yrs back and last month at 1+1. All they can do is make sure they put their phones face down near the table and throw the towel on top of his belongings.

 

[Davelovezcurves]

Nobody in sound mind will take this to the court and embarrass herself, her family and relatives. It happens all the time at lots of spas. It happened twice at Shangri La a few yrs back and last month at 1+1. All they can do is make sure they put their phones face down near the table and throw the towel on top of his belongings.

Pretty smart throw towels over the clothes you can record just the voices then lol no use in that.

 

[JakeOwen]

I haven't been thru the whole thread, but i a suspicious Steeles has cameras in each room. There is a black glass in every room. Always wondered about them.

 

[OppaiLover]

I haven't been thru the whole thread, but i a suspicious Steeles has cameras in each room. There is a black glass in every room. Always wondered about them.

Steeles doesn't have cameras in the room. A ludicrous accusation especially when they've already been sued because of Camilla and her shenanigans. Also, it's an asinine conclusion to come to based on this thread but hey, at least you admitted you didn't read it properly. Regardless, if you think they do, then don't go.

I chat with the receptionists sometimes and some of the shit guys try to pull is hilarious. If there were cameras in the room, half of the guys would be in jail and/or extorted.

 

[Essem]

I haven't been thru the whole thread, but i a suspicious Steeles has cameras in each room. There is a black glass in every room. Always wondered about them.

I've wondered about that myself - I actually asked one of the mpas about that and I was told that the girls were advised that it was a "fancy machine for sex toys" - apparently that is a touch screen where you can select butt plugs, handcuffs, didos, feathers etc for whatever fantasy you may have and then the box looking cabinets you see near the sinks across the room open with the item.

At first I thought cool, they are being innovative! But 12 months later its still a glass wall that looks tinted - very suspicious!!

Alex the owner at AGS was caught not to long (according to a post) for installing smart light bulb cameras in his rooms, so I wouldn't be surprised. If guys are recoding, I am sure that some spas have found a way to record us and watch the girls as well!

Maybe next time I'll act shady, pretend like I'm hiding a camera in the corner and see if when the mpa walks in she checks for it

 

[EndingHappy]

Steeles doesn't have cameras in the room. A ludicrous accusation especially when they've already been sued because of Camilla and her shenanigans. Also, it's an asinine conclusion to come to based on this thread but hey, at least you admitted you didn't read it properly. Regardless, if you think they do, then don't go.

I chat with the receptionists sometimes and some of the shit guys try to pull is hilarious. If there were cameras in the room, half of the guys would be in jail and/or extorted.

There was a lawsuit at Steeles?

 

[OppaiLover]

There was a lawsuit at Steeles?

Yeah the court documents for the claim are in a post on this forum if I remember correctly, so it's public knowledge. It was a rouge MPA but the spa got reeled in as well. It was apparently settled but, I don't know for how much though.

 

[EndingHappy]

Yeah the court documents for the claim are in a post on this forum if I remember correctly, so it's public knowledge. It was a rouge MPA but the spa got reeled in as well. It was apparently settled but, I don't know for how much though.

I don't want to dig through it all. Mind if you can just sum up what happened?

 

[OppaiLover]

I don't want to dig through it all. Mind if you can just sum up what happened?

The exact opposite of what happened in this thread. The roles were reversed as the client was the victim. He filed a claim and I heard that it was eventually settled. Like I said, not sure for how much but most likely a fraction of what he was asking since it was a rouge MPA and the spa would have had no way of knowing.

 

[JakeOwen]

Steeles doesn't have cameras in the room.

Unless you are the contractor who built the room..or own the spa....you have absolutely no way of knowing that. So STFU.

Maybe you have never been inside one of the Steeles room? who knows?? Don't behave as if you have a vested interest. Its a public forum and i expressed a Legit suspicion related to the post. Essem seemed to have the same suspicion!

 

[AthleticAF]

Lmao...so you swtich from insults to trying to be prim and proper now?.....the only one who is trying to save face is you.

Assumed blanket statement of not....man was clearly talking bout being illegally recorded in the context of the video and this entire thread.......and you felt the need to chime in with your irrelevant nonsense about how it's okay if it's audio....and how it's saved your ass before.........you know who was asking questions about illegal audio recordings here....NO ONE...... But if I want advice on how to deal with Geico, All State or Desjardins....I'll give you call lol.........way to make yourself seem important bruh *slow clap*

IT WAS A BLANKET STATEMENT about recordings.

Read what he said, copy it, paste it here and I'll continue.
Otherwise, take the L, like you take a dick.


BigPapi "Its illegal to record someone without there consent or knowledge"


The above is incorrect, period. Good thing you don't get paid to think eh?


I want to want say you're a Seduction girl, because they do take first prize for having the most mentally deficient girls around, or maybe SRM, they run a close second.

 

[OppaiLover]

Unless you are the contractor who built the room..or own the spa....you have absolutely no way of knowing that. So STFU.

Maybe you have never been inside one of the Steeles room? who knows?? Don't behave as if you have a vested interest. Its a public forum and i expressed a Legit suspicion related to the post. Essem seemed to have the same suspicion!

And I said if you're concerned then don't go. Simple. So much aggression for no reason. Stop embarassing yourself by behaving like belligerent teen. Listen, Ive known three of the managers on a personal basis for years, Tracy included. And my best friend's younger sister actually worked at Steeles and I asked her before, because I too was curious.

Look, you just started hobbying this year so you probably don't know anyone at the spa that well yet. I was just telling you what I know. But, like you said, it's a public forum so you're more than welcome to concoct your conspiracy theories.

RE Essem. He claims to know some of the girls really well. He could easily verify it by asking them if he wanted.

 

[Shag]

And I said if you're concerned then don't go. Simple. So much aggression for no reason. Stop embarassing yourself by behaving like belligerent teen. Listen, Ive known three of the managers on a personal basis for years, Tracy included. And my best friend's younger sister actually worked at Steeles and I asked her before, because I too was curious.

Look, you just started hobbying this year so you probably don't know anyone at the spa that well yet. I was just telling you what I know. But, like you said, it's a public forum so you're more than welcome to concoct your conspiracy theories.

RE Essem. He claims to know some of the girls really well. He could easily verify it by asking them if he wanted.

Ya gotta love people who shoot the shit.

For a business that had shenanigans and still had the person in their employ, gotta wonder.
Oh ya, srm had a talk with her

They probably will say that the next time too.

The picture was claimed by srm to be taken off a monitor, yet no picture of the monitor, no tilt. Almost like someone opened a locked door and went around the desk and accessed the security taping machine. Owner and manager have the key, not some rogue employee.

 

[Unknkowngenius]

IT WAS A BLANKET STATEMENT about recordings.

Read what he said, copy it, paste it here and I'll continue.
Otherwise, take the L, like you take a dick.


BigPapi "Its illegal to record someone without there consent or knowledge"


The above is incorrect, period. Good thing you don't get paid to think eh?


I want to want say you're a Seduction girl, because they do take first prize for having the most mentally deficient girls around, or maybe SRM, they run a close second.

Lol u can copy and paste that 1 sentence over and over like a broken record all you want bruh....it seems everyone besides you knows that Papi was talkin about recordings in the context of this thread which is video.....so if it have any slow mans here...it's definitely you....then in order to feel important you jumped in with audio recordings

Imma try and dumb it down for you.......let's say the entire thread was about steak....like we're all talking about prepping it, cooking it and eating it.......Papi says " yo we all know the best way to eat meat is medium rare"......then you chime in " nah man chicken is best well done....I'm a beast on the grill"......see where you went wrong.....yeah Papi said meat....but we all talking about steak so why the fuck you talking about chicken!? ........bruh just admit you had nothin to add and wanted to drop irrelevant knowledge..... Even papi told you to calm your horses cause he didn't give ah fuck bout audio legalities either

Yo and das the 4th time you talking bout dick other than your own....I think you might be on the wrong forum man

 

[OppaiLover]

[/QUOTE]

Ya gotta love people who shoot the shit.

For a business that had shenanigans and still had the person in their employ, gotta wonder.
Oh ya, srm had a talk with her

They probably will say that the next time too.

The picture was claimed by srm to be taken off a monitor, yet no picture of the monitor, no tilt. Almost like someone opened a locked door and went around the desk and accessed the security taping machine. Owner and manager have the key, not some rogue employee.

As far as I know the MPA no longer works there and both SRM and the MPA had to pay. The only way you could have actually seen the pic is if you were the plaintiff in that claim, so please, do tell. I'm intrigued.

 

[Shag]

As far as I know the MPA no longer works there and both SRM and the MPA had to pay. The only way you could have actually seen the pic is if you were the plaintiff in that claim, so please, do tell. I'm intrigued.
[/QUOTE]
yup

But I'm not shitting on you, just saying I have been in the office, I know where the equipment was ( pre-reno ), so the only plausible way in my eyes was that srm made an error. In my pov they are responsible for their part.

BtW. The only money came directly from srm or the owner, including the initial suit that was based on a promissory note.

If the spa was smart they could have taken a different route instead of the route they choose.

 

[OppaiLover]

As far as I know the MPA no longer works there and both SRM and the MPA had to pay. The only way you could have actually seen the pic is if you were the plaintiff in that claim, so please, do tell. I'm intrigued.

yup

But I'm not shitting on you, just saying I have been in the office, I know where the equipment was ( pre-reno ), so the only plausible way in my eyes was that srm made an error. In my pov they are responsible for their part.

BtW. The only money came directly crom srm or the owner, including the initial suit that was based a promissory note.

If the spa was smart they could have taken a different route instead of the route they choose.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah I know this whole ordeal happened pre reno when it was more of the wild west there. Tracy runs a tight ass ship now.

And I was helping Nikki and Tasha carry stuff into the office in June when they reopened after covid and I didn't notice anything there. Mind you, I wasn't really looking for anything. I'll pay attention next time lol.

And the claim may have just said SRM but I know the MPA had to foot the bill as well.

I am curious about the different route they could have taken but I guess that's a story for some other day. I have to be up early so it's bedtime for me.

 

[triggered2nite]

Dude tried to record with his phone for free. Sorry, brown guys are cheap always want a deal I deal with them in business. Could he afford a fancy spy cam maybe. But he would never as that would require spending more money. While you see he's a cheap fuck. Like so many sp's as low as $40-50 on top record whatever you want.

This is the case for many ethnicities, not a specific one. There are many "brown guys" who are beyond decent.
I don't understand how you can associate a skin colour to a person's personality.
Using skin as a determining factor is one of the shittiest things anyone can do. Stop acting high and mighty because you’re far from it.

 

[Toomanymiles]

Not sure if there are cameras in the room. If they did and tried to use it I’m sure there will be a lawyer willing to take that lawsuit.

 

[Shag]

yup

But I'm not shitting on you, just saying I have been in the office, I know where the equipment was ( pre-reno ), so the only plausible way in my eyes was that srm made an error. In my pov they are responsible for their part.

BtW. The only money came directly crom srm or the owner, including the initial suit that was based a promissory note.

If the spa was smart they could have taken a different route instead of the route they choose.

Yeah I know this whole ordeal happened pre reno when it was more of the wild west there. Tracy runs a tight ass ship now.

And I was helping Nikki and Tasha carry stuff into the office in June when they reopened after covid and I didn't notice anything there. Mind you, I wasn't really looking for anything. I'll pay attention next time lol.

And the claim may have just said SRM but I know the MPA had to foot the bill as well.

I am curious about the different route they could have taken but I guess that's a story for some other day. I have to be up early so it's bedtime for me.
[/QUOTE]

The initial claim was for a promissory note against a mpa. Well, don't you know Anita said I would never get my money from the mpa. You know d'em bitches b thinking they can take and not give back. So while Anita laughed at it, the case continued.
So the first case was against the mpa
Collecting can be done through garnishment, so srm was going to court so I could get paid. They could have tried to argue self-employed, but if they lost they knew the order would be sent to the cra as an updated determination. I'm sure their lawyer advised them to pay. That is when their lawyer was given notice about the lawsuit that would be put forth against them. Whether srm got reimbursed ain't my problem.
Srm initial defense is not the same defense as the new one put forth, you draw your own conclusions.

PS there is still another case against the mpa for the incident, in civil law you can double dip. Judgement has been obtained.