Your condition, suffering, delays and tribulations are all well known and understood by most of us on this site, and we can easily empathise with you. Look back on some older posts, you will see your experiences are well shared.
We have all similar ‘yet varied’ experiences, and that is what makes the HP forum, the best back pain forum on the web. I’m glad you like it.
I am very glad you recovering well, from what you have clearly described as, an improved open back procedure. The 4cm length is ‘indeed’ a great improvement on standard UK 6in for open, or a 3 inch for micro techniques.
Thank you for stating your support for our long, well stated and firmly held belief, that patients ‘must’ take charge of their own pre-op research and absolutely ‘must not’ simply accept a Surgeons unsupported words as Gospel, if they are to make a ‘truly’ informed choice.
I am not a Legal Eagle Budskinson, I am just a working class boy, a ‘logistics professional’ without a ‘PhD’, TCP or TNT, but I am fairly sure that the ‘sociopathic’ and ‘paranoia’ quips were aimed at me!
As you failed to clarify, I will assume they were!
I think your post is simply another case of ‘let’s shoot the messengers’. You make bold statements, yet offer no evidence, no stats, no peer reviewed papers, no links! Honestly, I expected far more from a ‘legal professional’ not the same old vitriolic rubbish!
I’m sure that you see yourself as ‘Atticus finch’, but even he would expect that as an important part of legal process, you should offer factual evidence to back up your words, instead of making personal and generalist insults to mask a lack of proof.
You are correct Budskinson, MISS and Standard spinal surgery ‘are both available’ in the UK, but to clarify to our American Cousins, only privately, and only to those who can afford it, like Bankers, Doctors and umm oh, ah yes Solicitors!
The fact is, that nearly all MISS spinal procedures are ‘not freely available’ at the ‘point of need’. That is to say, on the tax payer funded NHS, or (as you say) NHS regime!! For the rest of us, the great unwashed, we must save hard and sacrifice our savings, or go without MISS.
However, some of these same NHS Orthopaedic and Neuro Surgeons, can and do, offer various experimental MISS procedures in their private practices, procedures such as ‘IDET’
IPG319 Percutaneous intradiscal electrothermal therapy for low back pain: guidance
or the ‘Wallis Stabilisation technique’ which had no NICE listing, and of course the 'altered and improved' open back procedures I mentioned previously, and that you clearly benefited from.
Bare in mind, that a lot of these treatments are considered by NICE to be far more ‘risky’ than (ELF) but these same Doctors will brief against (ELF) whilst performing the riskier procedures themselves!! Hypocrisy!!
I find your ‘categorically unsupported opinion’ that the UK has a dynamic MISS sector, which does not respond to market or peer pressure, delusional!
It’s no wonder you don’t want the likes of me picking over your scant and baseless information. 90% SUCCESSFUL? Where did you get that from. I have been told similar figures over the last 7 years by 3 Spinal Surgeons, but when I ask for the trial information that proves this claim, they have got nothing to offer! As our American friends would say: WHERES THE BEEF?
Budskinson, How having a legal background gives you the right to demand that ‘we members’ should believe you ‘unquestioningly’ about ‘back pain matters’ without any facts and figures, is frankly quite bizarre and insulting!
If I ‘PM’ you Budskinson, Will you give ‘me’ the name of your Surgeon if I ask for it? No? Never mind then!!
(((quote))) If anyone would like to know who the surgeon is then please email me directly as i refuse to have anybody on this board make an unqualified assessment of his credentials.)))
On this point, let me put it to you: ah,ah, see what I did there?
if you went to court, and said to the judge, I have ‘devastating evidence’ which will prove ‘beyond any doubt’ that my case is right and just! However, the defence Solicitor & Barrister and the 12 jury members 'will not be allowed' to see it when together, nor will it be viewed in an open court!
What do you think the judge would say Budskinson?
We are chronically ill Budskinson, Not terminally STUPID!!!
With regards to my post with Amybt, the points I made were in response to her ‘not being sure’ whether she had an MISS operation or not, it was done to clarify any false impression she may have been labouring under, not for mischief sake! In addition, she herself invited the possibility and gave consent to members to research her Surgeon, by putting his name on her post.
I took the words and 'factual information' from a host of US web sites, 3 of which, I posted links for, in order for everyone to check for themselves and not just to take my word for it. I always try to offer links or other proof of my beliefs when offering an opinion, check my posts, you will see this is so!
I am repeating myself again, but yes, I agree with you Budskinson, and as I have repeatedly stated, there are some very good leading Surgeons who are working in their patients best interests! But not all, as you would have the world believe, or why else would you tell members to have MRI’s and to think for themselves? Your points are confused and convoluted Budskinson!!
Paranoia, sociopathic, no Sir, you are definitely not a mental health professional! Read more of my posts, before judging! Lest ye be judged!!
P.S. 2 words again Budskinson, 'spell check'.
SPINELF